Right here we go once more. The controversy concerning the Parthenon Marbles within the British Museum — ought to they, shouldn’t they be returned to Greece, the place a glowing purpose-built museum overlooking the Acropolis from which the sculptures had been wrenched by Lord Elgin from 1801-05 sits ready for them — appears to go on for ever.
It was within the Eighties that Melina Mercouri, then Greece’s minister of tradition, launched a passionate marketing campaign for his or her return; she by no means stopped making an attempt till her demise in 1994. An official request from Greece to the UK parliament was refused — however has remained open ever since. And it was greater than a decade in the past that my then colleague Peter Aspden, himself half Greek and a fervent Returner, put ahead on this paper a really thought of sensible plan which included mortgage and sharing preparations, and an possession construction that may save face all spherical. It might have saved an terrible lot of hassle — however some folks simply gained’t hear, will they?
This time spherical, the problem has been reignited by a back-and-forth between Jonathan Williams, British Museum deputy director, after he got here out with a super-cautious assertion a few doable new “cultural trade” settlement relating to the Parthenon sculptures, and Professor Nikolaos Stampolidis, director of the Acropolis Museum. The latter’s response was way more strong, escalating the controversy to world proportions: “The difficulty of the sculptures shouldn’t be bilateral, it’s a matter of worldwide, western tradition, not solely of Europe but additionally . . . of all of the democracies,” Stampolidis mentioned.
There are marble sculptures from the Parthenon in lots of locations — the Louvre, the Vatican, museums in Copenhagen, Vienna and Munich — however it’s the British Museum’s haul that issues most. Not simply when it comes to amount however for the sheer immorality and conceitedness of their plunder.
In each one of many a number of restitution and repatriation instances now so frequent throughout the globe, this side — the best way it occurred — lends a robust weighting to the rights and wrongs concerned. However these instances are typically fiendishly sophisticated, tying up legal professionals for years.
With regards to the authorized, fairly than the emotional or ethical, elements of restitution claims, antiquities and historic artefacts are sometimes less complicated. And the Parthenon Marbles are in all probability essentially the most clear-cut case of all: they reply all of the check questions. We all know the place they initially had been, when and the way they had been eliminated. There’s no hole within the chain of possession to solid doubts. And we all know that if (I ought to say when) they’re returned, they are going to be superbly cared for.
It’s not at all times so easy. There are objects that don’t actually have a certain hometown, a maker or an authentic proprietor. Some restitution claims check with a website of “fashionable discovery”: the place they had been dug up, purchased and even stolen, fairly than the place they had been created. These artefacts in limbo can current the most important issues for museum workers going through claims.
But regardless of all of the resistance from museums, regardless of the expense and problem, the tears and hassle and wars of phrases, restitution has been transferring at fairly a pace previously few years.
Within the US final 12 months an historic Gilgamesh pill was returned to Iraq, greater than 100 artefacts had been returned to Pakistan, and Ethiopia acquired necessary items looted within the 1860s by British troops. These items and plenty of like them had been retrieved by officers after they had been found being traded on the energetic however typically murky market in antiquities, the proceeds of theft, modern-day looting or unscrupulous dealings.
Germany has been behaving effectively, returning objects to its former colonial territories in present-day Namibia and asserting the return of their Benin bronzes; the Netherlands and Belgium have additionally made a collection of good-hearted strikes. And France’s senate in 2020 voted to return 27 necessary cultural objects to Benin and Senegal.
All this sounds very proper and correct and optimistic. However such artefacts, irrespective of how valuable, have a significance effectively past themselves, as Alexander Herman has identified in his latest e-book Restitution: The Return of Cultural Artefacts.
When President Emmanuel Macron of France made his dramatic pronouncement in Burkina Faso in 2017 — a sweeping promise to return all African artworks in French museums that had been illegally acquired — there was greater than artwork and antiquities on his thoughts. He was deploying cultural tender energy in some pretty apparent methods. Righting previous wrongs, sure. But additionally utilizing restitution as a manner of reasserting his nation’s standing francophone Africa, of trumpeting a clear break with the colonial previous, of forging new financial and diplomatic hyperlinks on a foundation of goodwill. As Herman places it: “The purpose of increasing French spheres of affect is effectively served by an engagement with African nations round questions of restitution.”
Herman talks about China, too. Typically by the market fairly than by official repatriation claims, China (and its millionaire elite) has been steadily recovering artwork and cultural objects taken by overseas invaders and adventurers. The restitution wars additionally work by different channels, although.
Based on Herman, “The spectacular new museum in Dakar, Senegal, that now holds restituted materials from France? Paid for with €35mn from China . . . And it must be added that the port of Dakar represents a vital deepwater transportation hub on the western tip of the continent.”
What’s extra, Chinese language president Xi Jinping waded into the Parthenon Marbles debate, firmly siding with the Returner trigger when he visited Greece in 2019. A diplomatically astute transfer, Herman says: not a foul concept to be good to the Greeks a few cultural subject “when the Chinese language-owned port of Piraeus is such a significant linchpin to China’s commerce with Europe”.
This explicit recreation of marbles, it appears, has some unwritten guidelines. Right now’s quarrels over items of stone or metallic can have vivid implications for the long run.
Jan Dalley is the FT’s arts editor
FTWeekend Pageant, London
Save the date for Saturday, September 3 to hearken to Jan Dalley and over 100 authors, scientists, politicians, cooks, artists and journalists at Kenwood Home Gardens, London. Select from 10 tents full of concepts and inspiration and an array of views, that includes all the things from debates to tastings, performances and extra. Ebook your go at ft.com/ftwf
Discover out about our newest tales first — observe @ftweekend on Twitter