In September 2022, The Epoch Occasions requested the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention to launch its Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) knowledge mining outcomes. PRR1 measures how frequent an adversarial occasion is for a selected drug in comparison with all the opposite medicine within the database.
In accordance with the usual working procedures2,3 for the Vaccine Adversarial Occasion Reporting System (VAERS), which is run collectively by the CDC and the Meals and Drug Administration, the CDC is required to carry out these knowledge mining analyses.
Not solely did the CDC refuse to launch the info, but it surely additionally supplied false info — twice — in response to The Epoch Occasions’ questions in regards to the monitoring being carried out. As reported by The Epoch Occasions again in September 2022,4 the CDC initially claimed PRR analyses have been “outdoors the company’s purview” and that no monitoring was being performed by them.
Ultimately, the company admitted it was doing PRRs, beginning in February 2021, solely to later declare they did not carry out any PRRs till March 2022. The Epoch Occasions additionally cited a number of papers during which the FDA and/or CDC claimed their knowledge mining efforts had come up empty handed.5 Now, we discover that was all a pack of lies.
CDC Monitoring Reveals A whole bunch of Security Alerts
In actuality, the CDC’s PRR monitoring reveals HUNDREDS of security alerts, together with Bell’s palsy, blood clots, pulmonary embolism and demise — all of which, in accordance with the principles, require thorough investigation to both affirm or rule out a potential hyperlink to the photographs. As reported by The Epoch Occasions in early January 2023:6
“The CDC evaluation was performed on adversarial occasions reported from Dec. 14, 2020, to July 29, 2022. The Epoch Occasions obtained the outcomes by a Freedom of Info Act request after the CDC refused to make the outcomes public …
PRR includes evaluating the incidence of a selected adversarial occasion after a selected vaccine to the incidence in spite of everything different vaccines. A sign is triggered when three thresholds are met, in accordance with the CDC: a PRR of no less than 2, a chi-squared statistic of no less than 4, and three or extra instances of the occasion following receipt of the vaccine being analyzed. Chi-squared exams are a type of statistical evaluation used to look at knowledge.
The outcomes obtained by The Epoch Occasions present that there are lots of of adversarial occasions (AEs) that meet the definition, together with critical situations corresponding to blood clotting within the lungs, intermenstrual bleeding, a scarcity of oxygen to the guts, and even demise. The excessive numbers, significantly the chi-squared figures, involved consultants.
For most of the occasions, ‘the chi-squared is so excessive that, from a Bayesian perspective, the chance that the true price of the AE of the COVID vaccines is just not greater than that of the non-COVID vaccines is actually zero,’ Norman Fenton, a professor of threat administration at Queen Mary College of London, instructed The Epoch Occasions in an electronic mail after operating the numbers by a Bayesian mannequin that gives chances primarily based on accessible info.”
Myopericarditis Is Far From the Solely Drawback
One of many few unintended effects of the COVID jabs that the CDC has truly acknowledged is myocarditis (coronary heart irritation), and a associated situation known as pericarditis (irritation of the guts sack). Alas, the PRR monitoring outcomes reveal there are greater than 500 different adversarial occasions which have stronger warning alerts than both of these situations.
Josh Guetzkow, an Israeli professor skilled in statistics at Princeton College instructed The Epoch Occasions:7
“We all know that the sign for myocarditis is related to one thing that’s brought on by the mRNA vaccines, so it is greater than cheap to say that something with a sign bigger than myocarditis/pericarditis must be taken critically and investigated.”
Guetzkow expanded on his commentary in a January 4, 2023, Substack article.8 Under is a abstract record of among the key findings from the CDC’s PRR evaluation. Guetzkow goes deeper in his article, so for extra particulars, I recommend studying it in its entirety.
For much more analyses and commentary, see Fenton’s Substack article, “The CDC’s Knowledge on COVID Vaccine Security Alerts.”9 If you wish to examine the PRR knowledge for your self, you’ll be able to obtain them from The Epoch Occasions’ January 3, 2023, article.10 You may as well discover them right here.11
|
In people aged 18 and older, there are security alerts for 770 totally different adversarial occasions, and two-thirds of them (greater than 500) have a stronger security sign than myocarditis and pericarditis. Of these 770 alerts, 12 are brand-new situations that haven’t been reported following different vaccines. Topping the record of security alerts are cardiovascular situations, adopted by neurological situations. In third and fourth place are thromboembolic situations and pulmonary situations. Loss of life is sixth on the record and most cancers is eleventh. Contemplating the uptick we have seen in aggressive cancers, the truth that demise tops most cancers actually says one thing. |
|
The variety of critical adversarial occasions reported between mid-December 2020 and the top of July 2022 (simply over 19 months) for the COVID jabs is 5.5 instances higher than all critical stories for vaccines given to adults within the U.S. over the past 13 years (roughly 73,000 versus 13,000). |
|
Twice as many COVID jab stories have been categorized as critical in comparison with all different vaccines given to adults (11% vs. 5.5%), which meets the definition of a security sign. |
|
The proportions of reported deaths, which was solely supplied for the 18+ age group, was 14% for the COVID jabs in comparison with 4.7% for all different vaccines. As famous by Fenton,12 “If the CDC want [sic] to assert that the chance a COVID vaccine adversarial occasion ends in demise is just not considerably greater than that of different vaccines the onus is on them to give you another causal clarification for this distinction.” |
|
Within the 12- to 17-year-old age group, there are 96 security alerts, together with myocarditis, pericarditis, Bell’s Palsy, genital ulcerations, hypertension, menstrual irregularities, cardiac valve incompetency, pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrhythmia, thrombosis, pericardial and pleural effusion, appendicitis and perforated appendix, immune thrombocytopenia, chest ache and elevated troponin ranges (indicative of coronary heart injury). |
|
Within the 5- to 11-year-old group, there are 66 security alerts, together with myocarditis, pericarditis, ventricular dysfunction, cardiac valve incompetency, pericardial and pleural effusion, chest ache, appendicitis and appendectomies, Kawasaki’s illness, menstrual irregularities and vitiligo. |
It is value noting that the CDC did not carry out its first security sign evaluation till March 25, 2022 — 15 months after the photographs have been rolled out. Why the lengthy wait — particularly because the CDC had introduced it will start monitoring in early 2021? Simply think about, for a second, what number of lives have been misplaced as a result of the CDC did not correctly monitor security, and nonetheless drags its ft with regards to warning folks in regards to the dangers concerned.
FDA Nonetheless Refuses to Share Security Knowledge
The FDA can be required to carry out security monitoring utilizing one other approach known as Empirical Bayesian knowledge mining. The Epoch Occasions first requested the FDA to launch its monitoring outcomes again in July 2022,13,14 however just like the CDC, the FDA refused and insisted the info confirmed no proof of great adversarial results. In different phrases, “Simply belief us. We’re consultants.”
In accordance with the FDA, the one potential sign they’d discovered by April 16, 2021, was for raised physique temperature.15 Then, in mid-December 2022 — simply 4 months after The Epoch Occasions tried to get these knowledge — the FDA introduced that pulmonary embolism (blood clots that block blood circulate within the lungs) had met the brink for a statistical sign, and continued to fulfill the standards after in-depth analysis, but it surely was solely linked to the Pfizer jab.16
As famous by The Epoch Occasions,17 pulmonary embolism can be recognized as a sign within the CDC’s PRR evaluation for people as younger as 12, which actually must strengthen considerations.
The FDA additionally admitted it had already evaluated three different warning alerts: lack of oxygen to the guts, immune thrombocytopenia (a blood platelet dysfunction) and intravascular coagulation (a sort of blood clotting), however none of those continued to fulfill the brink after evaluation.
If the FDA was evaluating 4 warning alerts, why did they inform The Epoch Occasions there was no proof of sick results, and why did they declare the one potential sign they’d discovered was slight fever? Are we to consider they found these alerts after The Epoch Occasions requested for the monitoring outcomes after which accomplished 4 in-depth investigations in 4 months?
Regardless of the fact, it is clear that each the CDC and FDA usually are not being clear. Worse, they’ve hidden knowledge, understanding it may imply the distinction between life and demise for lots of of 1000’s of individuals.
CDC Has Ignored Clear ‘Loss of life’ Sign
The CDC ignoring a transparent sign for demise might be essentially the most egregious instance of its failures as a public well being establishment. As early as July 2021, Matthew Crawford revealed a three-part collection18,19,20 detailing how the CDC was hiding security alerts through the use of a flawed formulation. In August that 12 months, Steve Kirsch knowledgeable the company of those issues, however was ignored.
Then, in an October 3, 2022, article,21 Kirsch went on to point out how “demise” ought to have triggered a sign even when utilizing the CDC’s flawed formulation (which is described in its VAERS commonplace working procedures handbook22). This is an excerpt:23
“The formulation the CDC makes use of for producing security alerts is essentially flawed; a ‘dangerous’ vaccine with a number of adversarial occasions will ‘masks’ giant numbers of vital security alerts … Let me summarize the important thing factors for you in a nutshell: PRR [proportional reporting ratio] is outlined on web page 16 within the CDC doc24 as follows …
A ‘security sign’ is outlined on web page 16 within the CDC doc as a PRR of no less than 2, chi-squared statistic of no less than 4, and three or extra instances of the AE [adverse event] following receipt of the particular vaccine of curiosity. That is the well-known ‘and clause.’ Right here it’s from the doc:
Solely somebody who’s incompetent or is intentionally making an attempt to make the vaccines look protected would use the phrase ‘and’ within the definition of a security sign.
Utilizing ‘and’ implies that if any one of many situations is not happy, no security sign might be generated. As famous under, the PRR will hardly ever set off which just about ensures that almost all occasions generated by an unsafe vaccine won’t ever get flagged.
The PRR worth for the COVID vaccines will hardly ever exceed 1 as a result of there are such a lot of adversarial occasions from the COVID vaccine as a result of it’s so harmful (i.e., B within the formulation is a big quantity) so the numerator is all the time close to zero. Therefore, the ‘security sign’ is never triggered as a result of the vaccine is so harmful.”
A Fictitious Instance
Utilizing a fictitious vaccine as the instance, Kirsch defined how an exceptionally harmful vaccine will fly underneath the radar and never get flagged, because of this flawed formulation:25
“Suppose we’ve the world’s most harmful vaccine that causes adversarial occasions in everybody who will get it and generates 25,000 totally different adversarial occasions, and every adversarial occasion has 1,000 situations.
That implies that the numerator is 1,000/25,000,000 which is simply 40 occasions per million reported occasions. Now let us take a look at actuals for one thing like deaths. For all different vaccines, there are 6,200 deaths and 1 million adversarial occasions whole.
Since 40 per million is lower than 6,200 deaths per million, we’re not even near producing a security sign for deaths from our hypothetical vaccine which killed 1,000 folks in a 12 months … The purpose is {that a} harmful vaccine can look very ‘protected’ utilizing the PRR formulation.”
Calculating Loss of life Sign for the COVID Jab
Subsequent, Kirsch calculates the PRR for demise for the COVID jab — utilizing VAERS knowledge and the CDC’s definitions and formulation. As of December 31, 2019, there have been 6,157 deaths and 918,717 adversarial occasions whole for all vaccines aside from the COVID shot. As of September 23, 2022, there have been 31,214 deaths and 1.4 million adversarial occasions whole for the COVID jabs. This is the formulation as defined by Kirsch:26
“PRR = (31,214/1.4e6) / (6,157/918,717) = 3.32, which exceeds the required threshold of two. In different phrases, the COVID vaccine is so lethal that even with all of the adversarial occasions generated by the vaccine, the demise sign didn’t get drowned out!
However there’s nonetheless the chi-square take a look at. Chi-square take a look at outcomes have been 18,549 for ‘demise,’ which vastly exceeds the required threshold of 4. The CDC chi-square take a look at is clearly happy for the COVID vaccine. As a result of the demise sign is so enormous, it even survived the PRR take a look at.
Because of this even utilizing the CDCs personal misguided … formulation, all three standards have been happy:
1. PRR>2 [PRR greater than 2]: It was 3.32
2. Chi-square>2 [Chi-square greater than 2]: It was 18,549
3. 3 or extra stories: There have been over 31,214 demise stories acquired by VAERS … which is greater than 3
A security sign ought to have been generated however wasn’t. Why not? … A whole bunch of 1000’s of American lives have been misplaced because of the incapacity of the CDC to deploy their very own flawed security sign evaluation … It has been identified since no less than 2004 that utilizing reporting odds ratio (ROR) is a greater estimate of relative threat than PRR.27 I do not know why the CDC would not use it.”
The CDC can be hiding the severity of unintended effects in different methods. As defined by Fenton,28 the way in which unintended effects are categorized by the CDC assist obfuscate the size of sure issues. For instance, “cardiac failure acute,” “cardiac failure,” “infarction,” “myocardial pressure” and “myocardial fibrosis” are listed as separate classes, despite the fact that in actual life they’re all potential results of myocarditis.
By separating them, you find yourself with fewer frequency counts per class, thereby providing you with an underpowered chi-square take a look at so {that a} warning sign is just not triggered. If associated classes have been merged, far stronger security alerts would possible emerge.
CDC Has No Cheap Protection
The CDC is accountable for monitoring each VAERS and V-Secure, and between these two databases, there is not any potential approach they might ever say they did not know the photographs have been harming and killing thousands and thousands of People.
The CDC additionally has entry to different databases, together with the Protection Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), which (earlier than it was deliberately altered29) confirmed large will increase in debilitating and deadly situations, together with a tripling of most cancers instances.30
The findings in these databases have by no means been introduced ahead throughout any of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) conferences or the FDA’s Vaccines and Associated Organic Merchandise Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) conferences, at which members have repeatedly voted to authorize the jabs to folks of all ages, together with infants and pregnant girls.
They even added these poisonous photographs to the childhood vaccine schedule — which permits states to mandate them for varsity attendance — with out addressing any of the 66 security alerts discovered within the CDC’s PRR evaluation. The actual fact of the matter is that the CDC has identified about these dangers all alongside, and there is not any excuse for not sharing and performing on these knowledge.
Assist Unfold the Phrase
Mainstream media are ignoring all of this, so assist unfold the phrase. Everybody must know what the CDC’s security knowledge reveal. To that finish, listed below are a couple of strategies for how one can assist:
- Write or name your members of Congress and ask them to analyze the CDC’s security monitoring — We can not have a public security company that’s incapable of monitoring security and taking applicable motion when issues are discovered, be it correcting a flawed formulation or saying {that a} security sign has been detected. After all, they need to additionally publish their findings as soon as an investigation has been made.
- Contact your native newspaper and urge them to analyze and report on the CDC’s failure to behave on security alerts.
- Share the info on social media and ask why nobody within the media, Congress, academia or medical neighborhood is investigating these issues.
- Share this info along with your physician and members of the medical neighborhood.
- Additionally share it with college directors, and ask them to elucidate how and why, in gentle of those knowledge, they’re nonetheless mandating COVID photographs.
